linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests: mount other filesystems with selinux context as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120125211438.GA11821@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:14:38 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests: mount other filesystems with selinux
 context as well

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:11:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> For some reason, non-xfs filesystems aren't getting mounted with
> the selinux context; perhaps because none of the xattr tests used
> to work on anything but xfs?
> 
> Anyway, 062 fails for extN unless we mount with the fs-wide
> context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
> ps: eparis says this should work for NFS as well, let's go for
> it and if infrequently tested filesystems have trouble we can
> exclude them as necessary.

Verifying that assumption isn't hard, please do it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html