[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <loom.20120128T050950-718@post.gmane.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:53:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: WIMPy <WIMPy@...i.dk>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] can't recover ext4 on lvm from ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 1687, 32254 clusters in bitmap, 32258 in gd
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka <at> redhat.com> writes:
> The existence of a snapshot changes I/O completion times significantly, so
> it may be a race condition in ext4 that gets triggered which changed
> timings.
The idea that timing might cause issues on a FS is disturbing.
> > this is a problem which apparently occurred when the user went from
> > v3.1.5 to v3.2, so this looks likes 3.2 regression.)
I am on 3.2.0 as well.
It happened for me on a freshly created FS.
"mke2fs -j -O sparse_super -O dir_index -O extents -O filetype -O uninit_bg"
mounted with no additional options for the first time I got an
"EXT4-fs error (device md127): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 28671, 32765
clusters in bitmap, 32766 in gd"
after writing about 3TB of data.
I do not have RO snapshots as the OP, but my md sits on to of luks containers.
So we do have the device mapper in common.
Just for the records: Unlike the contents, the hardware is not new and did not
have any known issues.
Greetings,
WIMPy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists