linux-ext4 - Re: [dm-devel] can't recover ext4 on lvm from ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 1687, 32254 clusters in bitmap, 32258 in gd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <EBC820CD-E86F-48BB-ADA3-38B5C8A75187@dilger.ca>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:34:28 -0700
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	WIMPy <WIMPy@...i.dk>
Cc:	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] can't recover ext4 on lvm from ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 1687, 32254 clusters in bitmap, 32258 in gd

Could you please try to bisect the problem, if it is reproducible?

I was looking for a change which I thought might be responsible (removal of block bitmap initialization when inodes are first allocated from an uninitialized inode table) but I couldn't see it in the git log, so maybe that change has not landed yet.

I don't have any other ideas of which recent patches might be responsible at this point. 

Cheers, Andreas

On 2012-01-28, at 1:14, WIMPy <WIMPy@...i.dk> wrote:

> Update:
> 
>>>>> this is a problem which apparently occurred when the user went from
>>>> v3.1.5 to v3.2, so this looks likes 3.2 regression.)
>> 
>> I am on 3.2.0 as well.
> 
> I didn't spot anything obvious in the logs.
> 
>> It happened for me on a freshly created FS.
>> "mke2fs -j -O sparse_super -O dir_index -O extents -O filetype -O uninit_bg"
>> mounted with no additional options for the first time I got an
>> "EXT4-fs error (device md127): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:739: group 28671, 32765 
>> clusters in bitmap, 32766 in gd"
>> after writing about 3TB of data.
>> I do not have RO snapshots as the OP, but my md sits on to of luks 
> containers. 
>> So we do have the device mapper in common.
> 
> After I did an fsck and tried to continue, I didn't get that far.
> After another 200GB or so it happened again.
> And now it's reproducible:
> I can run fsck and then try to continue (using rsync). But as soon as writing 
> starts, the process hangs for a long time. At least one minute, probably longer.
> Then the ext4_mb_generate_buddy comes again.
> 
> I upgraded e2fstools from 1.41.14 to 1.42 and the kernel to 3.2.2.
> No difference.
> That FS is unusable.
> 
>> Just for the records: Unlike the contents, the hardware is not new and did 
> not 
>> have any known issues.
>> 
>>  Greetings,
>>    WIMPy
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html