[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120202160118.GI31730@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:01:18 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext3: Don't call dquot_free_block() if we don't
update anything
On Mon 30-01-12 17:41:25, Kazuya Mio wrote:
> dquot_free_block() is called in the end of ext3_new_blocks() and updates
> information of the inode structure. However, this update is not necessary
> if the number of blocks we requested is equal to the number of
> allocated blocks.
This is obviously correct thing to do so I've merged this patch into
my tree. Thanks.
Honza
>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
> ---
> fs/ext3/balloc.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/balloc.c b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> index a203892..954a7d3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> @@ -1743,8 +1743,11 @@ allocated:
>
> *errp = 0;
> brelse(bitmap_bh);
> - dquot_free_block(inode, *count-num);
> - *count = num;
> +
> + if (num < *count) {
> + dquot_free_block(inode, *count-num);
> + *count = num;
> + }
>
> trace_ext3_allocate_blocks(inode, goal, num,
> (unsigned long long)ret_block);
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists