[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x491uq51hsc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:11:47 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
> Look at what ext4_sync_file() does. It's more efficient than this.
> You need something like:
> commit_tid = file->f_flags & __O_SYNC ? EXT4_I(inode)->i_sync_tid :
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid;
> if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER &&
> !jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier(journal, commit_tid))
> needs_barrier = true;
> jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, commit_tid);
> jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, commit_tid);
> if (needs_barrier)
> blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_NOIO, NULL);
If the transaction won't send a data barrier, wouldn't you want to issue
the flush on the data device prior to commiting the transaction, not
after it?
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists