linux-ext4 - Re: e2fsck and backup superblocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <B2C249E4-41BE-400F-BC11-B1F7ABDE308E@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:11:12 -0500 (EST)
From:	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Phillip Susi <psusi@...ntu.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e2fsck and backup superblocks

On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:31 PM, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:05:36PM -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 2/17/12 7:00 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>>> I have noticed that e2fsck always complains about block group descriptor checksums being invalid when run on a backup superblock, even when run again immediately after being told to fix them.  Is there some odd intentional behavior here I'm not aware of?
>> 
>> Check the list for:
>> 
>> "[PATCH] libext2fs: quiet spurious group checksum errors"
> 
> Which is in e2fsprogs 1.42.1....
> 
Was that the release announcement?  :)

- Eric

>                                                  - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html