[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49zkc7c36m.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:49:21 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] ext4: clean up the flags passed to __blockdev_direct_IO for extent-based files
Hi,
For extent-based files, you can perform DIO to holes, as mentioned in
the comments in ext4_ext_direct_IO. However, that function passes
DIO_SKIP_HOLES to __blockdev_direct_IO, which is *really* confusing to
the uninitiated reader. The key, here, is that the get_block function
passed in, ext4_get_block_write, completely ignores the create flag that
is passed to it (the create flag is passed in from the direct I/O code,
which uses the DIO_SKIP_HOLES flag to determine whether or not it should
be cleared).
This is a long-winded way of saying that the DIO_SKIP_HOLES flag is
ultimately ignored. So, in the interest of preserving sanity, I propose
the following patch.
Cheers,
Jeff
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index feaa82f..521ca03 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2940,7 +2940,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_ext_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
ext4_get_block_write,
ext4_end_io_dio,
NULL,
- DIO_LOCKING | DIO_SKIP_HOLES);
+ DIO_LOCKING);
if (iocb->private)
EXT4_I(inode)->cur_aio_dio = NULL;
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists