[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120229144244.GF5054@shiny>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:42:44 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
lczerner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
[ btrfs faster than ext for find and cp -a ]
> 2012/2/29 Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>:
>
> I will try to answer the question from the broken email I've sent.
>
> @Lukas, it was always a fresh FS on top of LVM logical volume. I've
> been cleaning cache/remounting to sync all data before (re)doing
> tests.
The next step is to get cp -a out of the picture, in this case you're
benchmarking both the read speed and the write speed (what are you
copying to btw?).
Using tar cf /dev/zero <some_dir> is one way to get a consistent picture
of the read speed.
You can confirm the theory that it is directory order causing problems
by using acp to read the data.
http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/acp/acp-0.6.tar.bz2
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists