lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:43:41 +0100
From:	Jacek Luczak <>
To:	Chris Mason <>,
	Jacek Luczak <>,
	Hillf Danton <>,,
	linux-fsdevel <>,
	LKML <>,,
Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance

2012/3/1 Chris Mason <>:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>> 2012/3/1 Hillf Danton <>:
>> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak <> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with made my day :)
>> >>
>> >> seekwatcher run of tar cf to eliminate writes (all done on 3.2.7):
>> >> 1) btrfs:
>> >> 2) ext4:
>> >> 3) both merged:
> Whoa, seekwatcher makes it pretty clear.

Yep, ext4 is close to my wife's closet.

>> >>
>> >> I will send acp results soon.
>> >>
>> > Would you please take reiserfs into account?
>> As of now not (lack of time) but I'm pretty close to consider XFS in
>> the game. Whenever I will have more time and there won't be a pressure
>> on giving host back to production I will redo same tests for reiserfs.
>> Now I'm focused on the userspace sorting results.
> reiserfs should have results very similar to ext4.  The directory
> hashing used by reiserfs is going to result in a very random read
> pattern.
> XFS will probably beat btrfs in this test.  Their directory indexes
> reflect on disk layout very well.

True, but not that fast on small files.

Except the question I've raised in first mail there's a point in all
those action. We are maintaining host that are used for building
software: random access, lot of small files and dirs (always a co),
heavy parallel IO. We were testing XFS vs ext4 a year ago and XFS was
around 10% slower on build times. We did not - yet - done same on
btrfs. Now we're looking for replacement for ext4 as we suffer from
those issue - but we were not aware of that until stepped into this

If you would like me to do some specific tests around ext4 and btrfs,
let me know.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists