lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:00:38 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <>
To:	Jacek Luczak <>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <>,,
	linux-fsdevel <>,
	LKML <>,
Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance

On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
> I've took both on tests. The subject is acp and spd_readdir used with
> tar, all on ext4:
> 1) acp:
> 2) spd_readdir:
> 3) both:
> The acp looks much better than spd_readdir but directory copy with
> spd_readdir decreased to 52m 39sec (30 min less).

Do you have stats on how big these files are, and how fragmented they
are?  For acp and spd to give us this, I think something has gone wrong
at writeback time (creating individual fragmented files).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists