linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:18:16 -0500
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Cc:	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, yong.fan@...mcloud.com,
	sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...mcloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int
 may_flags' in nfsd_open()

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:08:19PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Yes, that would be fine.
> 
> (There may well be some conflict: simplest might be if you can get that
> pushed out to a stable public branch somewhere, hopefully before the
> merge window opens, and that'll give me a chance to pull it and handle
> any merge conflicts.

Are the commits you're worried about on the NFS side already in
linux-next?  If so, I'll do a quick test merge and see if there are
any conflicts.  If so, I'll segregate out these patches into a
separate pre-merge branch --- and then if you like you could pull them
into your branch and we can deal with it that way.

     	  	     	    	      	 - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html