lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:18:15 -0500 From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] ext4: Do not discard group with BLOCK_UNINIT set On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:11:58PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Because the BLOCK_UNINIT is only set on mke2fs time and cleared when > allocation from that group takes place we know that when set, there was > not anything allocated from that group, hence there should not be anything > to discard from the file system point of view. There's a really good reason to set BLOCK_UNINIT once we have noticed that all of the blocks in the block group have been released.... If you have a 3TB HDD, running e2fsck takes 4 times as long if all of the block groups have BLOCK_UNINIT cleared, compared to a freshly mkfs'ed file system. As a result of my getting really annoyed at how long it took in this case, I'm planning on making e2fsck clear BLOCK_UNINIT if possible, so that subsequent e2fsck's (and dumpe2fs and debugfs invocations) can also be fast. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists