| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1331159533.12984.73.camel@fourier>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:32:13 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, dchinner@...hat.com,
sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] ext4: Convert to new freezing mechanism
Re: the patch set:
[PATCH 00/19] Fix filesystem freezing deadlocks
In my initial smoke testing of this, I find that if I freeze a newly
created ext4 filesystem immediately after mounting it for the very first
time, then I get the new SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE warning from
ext4_journal_start_sb() every 0.4 seconds from ext4lazyinit...
# mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdaX
# mount /dev/sdaX /mnt
# fsfreeze -f /mnt
WARNING:
at /home/kamal/src/linux/ubuntu-precise/fs/ext4/super.c:301
ext4_journal_start_sb+0x159/0x160()
Pid: 3252, comm: ext4lazyinit Tainted: G W
3.2.0-18-generic #28+kamal1+jankara1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106724f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[<ffffffff810672aa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff812352c9>] ext4_journal_start_sb+0x159/0x160
[<ffffffff8121326b>] ? ext4_init_inode_table+0xab/0x370
[<ffffffff8121326b>] ext4_init_inode_table+0xab/0x370
[<ffffffff81659cb5>] ? schedule_timeout+0x175/0x320
[<ffffffff81226905>] ext4_run_li_request+0x85/0xe0
[<ffffffff812269fc>] ext4_lazyinit_thread+0x9c/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81226960>] ? ext4_run_li_request+0xe0/0xe0
[<ffffffff8108a39c>] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
[<ffffffff81665e34>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff8108a310>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xa0/0xa0
[<ffffffff81665e30>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
-Kamal
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 17:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> We remove most of frozen checks since upper layer takes care
> of blocking all writes. We only have to handle protection in
> ext4_page_mkwrite() in a special way because we cannot use
> generic block_page_mkwrite().
>
> CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 ++-----
> fs/ext4/super.c | 29 +++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index feaa82f..c65baf9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -4593,11 +4593,7 @@ int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> get_block_t *get_block;
> int retries = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * This check is racy but catches the common case. We rely on
> - * __block_page_mkwrite() to do a reliable check.
> - */
> - vfs_check_frozen(inode->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> + sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> /* Delalloc case is easy... */
> if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC) &&
> !ext4_should_journal_data(inode) &&
> @@ -4665,5 +4661,6 @@ retry_alloc:
> out_ret:
> ret = block_page_mkwrite_return(ret);
> out:
> + sb_end_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 502c61f..0f1024a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -289,33 +289,17 @@ static void ext4_put_nojournal(handle_t *handle)
> * journal_end calls result in the superblock being marked dirty, so
> * that sync() will call the filesystem's write_super callback if
> * appropriate.
> - *
> - * To avoid j_barrier hold in userspace when a user calls freeze(),
> - * ext4 prevents a new handle from being started by s_frozen, which
> - * is in an upper layer.
> */
> handle_t *ext4_journal_start_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nblocks)
> {
> journal_t *journal;
> - handle_t *handle;
>
> trace_ext4_journal_start(sb, nblocks, _RET_IP_);
> if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> return ERR_PTR(-EROFS);
>
> + WARN_ON(sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE);
> journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
> - handle = ext4_journal_current_handle();
> -
> - /*
> - * If a handle has been started, it should be allowed to
> - * finish, otherwise deadlock could happen between freeze
> - * and others(e.g. truncate) due to the restart of the
> - * journal handle if the filesystem is forzen and active
> - * handles are not stopped.
> - */
> - if (!handle)
> - vfs_check_frozen(sb, SB_FREEZE_TRANS);
> -
> if (!journal)
> return ext4_get_nojournal();
> /*
> @@ -4280,10 +4264,8 @@ int ext4_force_commit(struct super_block *sb)
> return 0;
>
> journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
> - if (journal) {
> - vfs_check_frozen(sb, SB_FREEZE_TRANS);
> + if (journal)
> ret = ext4_journal_force_commit(journal);
> - }
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -4315,9 +4297,8 @@ static int ext4_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> * gives us a chance to flush the journal completely and mark the fs clean.
> *
> * Note that only this function cannot bring a filesystem to be in a clean
> - * state independently, because ext4 prevents a new handle from being started
> - * by @sb->s_frozen, which stays in an upper layer. It thus needs help from
> - * the upper layer.
> + * state independently. It relies on upper layer to stop all data & metadata
> + * modifications.
> */
> static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> @@ -4344,7 +4325,7 @@ static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
> EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
> error = ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> out:
> - /* we rely on s_frozen to stop further updates */
> + /* we rely on upper layer to stop further updates */
> jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal);
> return error;
> }
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists