[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1pqcnf3sh.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:36:30 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Don't do page stablization if !CONFIG_BLKDEV_INTEGRITY
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> writes:
Ted> Martin, would you be willing to try to get your patch submitted for
Ted> the upcoming merge window? Or I'd be willing to carry your patch
Ted> and then rework Darrick's to use the exported flag, and carry it in
Ted> my tree, maybe that would be better.
There's probably going to be some conflicts due to both topology updates
and the write same changes I have pending. So it's probably best that I
submit this patch as part of my kits for Jens and James. Should go out
today.
Ted> why should we be inflicting pretty severe performance regressions
Ted> for the common case, just to improve things for obscure high-end
Ted> hardware?
I'm perfectly ok with that now that we have established that there are
real world workloads that do suffer with the wait in place.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists