linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F5FA827.8020606@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:03:51 +0100
From:	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, yong.fan@...mcloud.com,
	sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...mcloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags'
 in nfsd_open()

On 03/13/2012 09:01 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:50PM -0400, bfields wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:49:21AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Linus in general doesn't like cross tree merges (or any extraneous
>>>>> merges) unless they are absolutely necessary; but then, he trusts git
>>>>> merges more than many of us do.  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I've put the the patch series on a separate patch, with a signed tag, at:
>>>>>
>>>>>       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git nfs-ext4-premerge
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you confirm that you've pulled it into your tree and it's landed
>>>>> in linux-next?  I probably won't bother pulling it in mine unless
>>>>> there is definitely a merge conflict that I need to resolve.  (I've
>>>>> checked and there do not appear to be any against linux-next as of
>>>>> last night.)
>>>>
>>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> Whoops, sorry.
>>>
>>> Looks perfect, thanks for handling these!
>>>
>>> I'm running them through my usual regression tests
>>
>> Urgh, I'm seeing a failure on the telldir test (part of the "special"
>> connectathon tests).  I haven't looked at what it's trying to do yet.
>> Reproduceable even just on a local filesystem without NFS involved.  If
>> someone wants to look at it, you can just do:
>>
>> 	git clone git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/cthon04.git
>> 	cd cthon04
>> 	make
>> 	NFS_TESTDIR=/somewhere_on_an_ext4_fs/TMP ./runtests -s
>>
>> (Or after running that, more specifically,
>>
>> 	cd /somewhere_on_an_ext4_fs/TMP/
>> 	./telldir
>>
>> )
>>
>> I'll look at it tomorrow.
>
> Looks like seekdir is just not accepting an offset returned from
> getdents:
>
> 	openat(AT_FDCWD, "telldir-test", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> 	getdents(3, {...{d_ino=20386, d_off=5728083968307607285, d_reclen=24, d_name="192"}...} = 4848
> 	lseek(3, 5728083968307607285, SEEK_SET) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>
> Still investigating.

Thanks! I'm also just going to work on it (just noticed your mail while 
on vacation ...).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html