linux-ext4 - [PATCH v3.1 16/54] e2fsck: Verify block bitmap checksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120313003334.GS15164@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:33:34 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Coly Li <colyli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3.1 16/54] e2fsck: Verify block bitmap checksum

Check block bitmap checksum and write a new checksum if the
verification fails.  This is ok because e2fsck has already computed
the correct block bitmap.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
---

 e2fsck/pass5.c   |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 e2fsck/problem.c |    5 ++++
 e2fsck/problem.h |    3 +++
 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass5.c b/e2fsck/pass5.c
index bfcf384..64a751d 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass5.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass5.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static void check_inode_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx);
 static void check_inode_end(e2fsck_t ctx);
 static void check_block_end(e2fsck_t ctx);
 static void check_inode_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx);
+static void check_block_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx);
 
 void e2fsck_pass5(e2fsck_t ctx)
 {
@@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ void e2fsck_pass5(e2fsck_t ctx)
 		return;
 
 	check_inode_bitmap_checksum(ctx);
+	check_block_bitmap_checksum(ctx);
 
 	ext2fs_free_inode_bitmap(ctx->inode_used_map);
 	ctx->inode_used_map = 0;
@@ -136,6 +138,67 @@ static void check_inode_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx)
 	ext2fs_free_mem(&buf);
 }
 
+static void check_block_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx)
+{
+	struct problem_context	pctx;
+	struct ext4_group_desc	*gdp;
+	char		*buf;
+	dgrp_t		i;
+	int		nbytes;
+	blk64_t		blk_itr;
+	errcode_t	retval;
+
+	if (!EXT2_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(ctx->fs->super,
+					EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM))
+		return;
+
+	/* If bitmap is dirty from being fixed, checksum will be corrected */
+	if (ext2fs_test_bb_dirty(ctx->fs))
+		return;
+
+	nbytes = (size_t)(EXT2_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(ctx->fs->super) / 8);
+	retval = ext2fs_get_memalign(ctx->fs->blocksize, ctx->fs->blocksize,
+				     &buf);
+	if (retval) {
+		com_err(ctx->program_name, 0,
+		    _("check_block_bitmap_checksum: Memory allocation error"));
+		fatal_error(ctx, 0);
+	}
+
+	clear_problem_context(&pctx);
+	for (i = 0; i < ctx->fs->group_desc_count; i++) {
+		if (ext2fs_bg_flags_test(ctx->fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))
+			continue;
+
+		blk_itr = EXT2FS_B2C(ctx->fs,
+				     ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block) +
+			  (i * (nbytes << 3));
+		gdp = (struct ext4_group_desc *)ext2fs_group_desc(ctx->fs,
+				ctx->fs->group_desc, i);
+		retval = ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2(ctx->fs->block_map,
+							blk_itr, nbytes << 3,
+							buf);
+		if (retval)
+			break;
+
+		if (ext2fs_block_bitmap_csum_verify(ctx->fs, i, buf, nbytes))
+			continue;
+		pctx.group = i;
+		if (!fix_problem(ctx, PR_5_BLOCK_BITMAP_CSUM_INVALID, &pctx))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Fixing one checksum will rewrite all of them.  The bitmap
+		 * will be checked against the one we made during pass1 for
+		 * discrepancies, and fixed if need be.
+		 */
+		ext2fs_mark_bb_dirty(ctx->fs);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	ext2fs_free_mem(&buf);
+}
+
 static void e2fsck_discard_blocks(e2fsck_t ctx, io_manager manager,
 				  blk64_t start, blk64_t count)
 {
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 79ad34d..8476bc2 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -1689,6 +1689,11 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
 	  N_("@g %g @i bitmap does not match checksum\n"),
 	  PROMPT_FIX, PR_LATCH_IBITMAP | PR_PREEN_OK },
 
+	/* Group N block bitmap does not match checksum */
+	{ PR_5_BLOCK_BITMAP_CSUM_INVALID,
+	  N_("@g %g @b bitmap does not match checksum\n"),
+	  PROMPT_FIX, PR_LATCH_BBITMAP | PR_PREEN_OK },
+
 	/* Post-Pass 5 errors */
 
 	/* Recreate journal if E2F_FLAG_JOURNAL_INODE flag is set */
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index 0adc7ea..39e6dba 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -1022,6 +1022,9 @@ struct problem_context {
 /* Inode bitmap checksum does not match */
 #define PR_5_INODE_BITMAP_CSUM_INVALID	0x05001A
 
+/* Block bitmap checksum does not match */
+#define PR_5_BLOCK_BITMAP_CSUM_INVALID	0x05001B
+
 /*
  * Post-Pass 5 errors
  */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html