linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120314160529.GB31194@fieldses.org>
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:05:29 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	yong.fan@...mcloud.com, sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...mcloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int
 may_flags' in nfsd_open()

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 10:29 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:09:05PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> Hmm, there must have gone something wrong on merging,
> >
> > In that case one approach would be to rebase your last-sent patches on
> > to the same base as Ted's versions, confirm that one still works and the
> > other doesn't, and do a diff....
> >
> >> my own test
> >> also fails
> >>
> >> http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/test_seekdir/
> >>
> >> (Sorry, it does not say 'failure', but one needs to compare the file
> >> names and telldir-offset numbers)
> >>
> >> I think I will continue in the morning as its already 1 a.m. here.
> >
> > OK, thanks for following up!
> 
> Took me some time to figure out what is going on and in the end I previously forgot 
> another test case - I always tested directories being sufficiently large, so that 
> they got the EXT4_INODE_INDEX flag. However, the cython tests failed on a small 
> directory, which doesn't have that flag. But then ext4_readdir() always uses the 
> dx version, I guess in order to always return the same offset values 
> (in the sense of converting a non-dx dir to dx). In ext4_dir_llseek() I only 
> tested for the EXT4_INODE_INDEX flag, which is not correct in any case.
> So here is the patch,

Yep, that passes my usual tests now, thanks!

> shall I sent an updated version of the previous ext4 patch 
> or is this patch sufficient?

Up to Ted.

Ted, I haven't published my merge of your branch, so at least for my
purposes I don't care whether you fold this in or pop another patch on
top.

--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/dir.c b/fs/ext4/dir.c
> index 71a66ff..6a19a35 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/dir.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ static unsigned char get_dtype(struct super_block *sb, int filetype)
>  	return (ext4_filetype_table[filetype]);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * Check if the given dir-inode refers to an htree indexed directory
> + *
> + * Return 1 if it is a dx dir, 0 if not
> + */
> +static int is_dx_dir(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> +
> +	if (EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> +		     EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_INDEX) &&
> +	    ((ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INDEX)) ||
> +	     ((inode->i_size >> sb->s_blocksize_bits) == 1)))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Return 0 if the directory entry is OK, and 1 if there is a problem
>   *
> @@ -99,18 +117,13 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *filp,
>  	unsigned int offset;
>  	int i, stored;
>  	struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de;
> -	struct super_block *sb;
>  	int err;
>  	struct inode *inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> +	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int dir_has_error = 0;
>  
> -	sb = inode->i_sb;
> -
> -	if (EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> -				    EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_INDEX) &&
> -	    ((ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INDEX)) ||
> -	     ((inode->i_size >> sb->s_blocksize_bits) == 1))) {
> +	if (is_dx_dir(inode)) {
>  		err = ext4_dx_readdir(filp, dirent, filldir);
>  		if (err != ERR_BAD_DX_DIR) {
>  			ret = err;
> @@ -308,7 +321,7 @@ loff_t ext4_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>  	loff_t ret = -EINVAL;
> -	int is_dx_dir = ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INDEX);
> +	int dx_dir = is_dx_dir(inode);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>  
> @@ -323,7 +336,7 @@ loff_t ext4_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  
>  		/* so only negative offsets are left, does that have a
>  		 * meaning for directories at all? */
> -		if (is_dx_dir)
> +		if (dx_dir)
>  			offset += ext4_get_htree_eof(file);
>  		else
>  			offset += inode->i_size;
> @@ -347,7 +360,7 @@ loff_t ext4_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  	if (unlikely(offset < 0))
>  		goto out_err;
>  
> -	if (!is_dx_dir) {
> +	if (!dx_dir) {
>  		if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
>  			goto out_err;
>  	} else if (offset > ext4_get_htree_eof(file))
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html