[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1332333293-25028-2-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:34:53 +0100
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs tests: fix f_bad_disconnected_inode e2fsck output
Since we removed EOFBLOCKS_FL flag handling, we have to fix the
f_bad_disconnected_inode test so that e2fsck output correspond with the
new version of the code where we do not check for the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag
at all.
Simply remove EOFBLOCKS_FL flag warnings from expect.1 e2fsck output.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
---
tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 | 9 ---------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
index d3920e3..11862f6 100644
--- a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
+++ b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
@@ -2,21 +2,12 @@ Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 1 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
Clear? yes
-Inode 9 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
-Inode 10 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
Inode 15 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
Clear? yes
Inode 16 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
Clear? yes
-Inode 13 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
-Clear? yes
-
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
/lost+found not found. Create? yes
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists