linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs tests: fix f_bad_disconnected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1203230903120.8421@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:03:35 +0100 (CET)
From:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs tests: fix f_bad_disconnected_inode e2fsck
 output

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Ted Ts'o wrote:

> Thanks, I've applied these two patches as a single commit.  (In
> general the regression tests should always pass after each commit, so
> that git bisects work correctly.)

Right, it makes sense.

Thanks
-Lukas

> 
> 					- Ted
> 
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > Since we removed EOFBLOCKS_FL flag handling, we have to fix the
> > f_bad_disconnected_inode test so that e2fsck output correspond with the
> > new version of the code where we do not check for the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag
> > at all.
> > 
> > Simply remove EOFBLOCKS_FL flag warnings from expect.1 e2fsck output.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 |    9 ---------
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
> > index d3920e3..11862f6 100644
> > --- a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
> > +++ b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1
> > @@ -2,21 +2,12 @@ Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> >  Inode 1 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
> >  Clear? yes
> >  
> > -Inode 9 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
> > -Clear? yes
> > -
> > -Inode 10 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
> > -Clear? yes
> > -
> >  Inode 15 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
> >  Clear? yes
> >  
> >  Inode 16 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support.
> >  Clear? yes
> >  
> > -Inode 13 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1)
> > -Clear? yes
> > -
> >  Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> >  Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> >  /lost+found not found.  Create? yes
> > -- 
> > 1.7.4.4
> > 
> 

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html