linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext2: Don't export ext2_mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMjpGUcqSSSVy1MSRa_41UkKWc4VOn2yetxLOa=RbE0L7YGHYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:51:35 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Andreas Dilger <aedilger@...il.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	ThierryReding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: Don't export ext2_mask_flags() to user space

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 20:25, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2012-03-22, at 11:31, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:28:25PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>>> Even if they're not iwlling to use libext2fs (for space reasons, I
>>> would assume?  It can't be because of license compatibility issues
>>> since they are both GPLv2), they could just simply grab the ext2_fs.h
>>> from e2fsprogs.  That has all of the file system definitions for ext2,
>>> ext3, and ext4.
>>
>> Ho-hum...  Then we could kill a lot of lines in include/linux/ext2_fs.h.
>> I wonder how much of what remains has any business being outside of
>> fs/ext2, actually - AFAICS, there are very few places that might possibly
>> care:
>>
>> arch/blackfin/kernel/setup.c:595:       if (*((unsigned short *)(mtd_phys + 0x438)) == EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC)
>> fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c:599:         case EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC:
>> fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c:600:                 resp->p_link_max = EXT2_LINK_MAX;
>> fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c:601:                 resp->p_name_max = EXT2_NAME_LEN;
>
> These don't really make sense to be using ext2 constants.

i'm guessing your quoting is over zealous and you're not actually
talking about the Blackfin code here ... just the nfsd code
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html