[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120412212534.GF6667@fieldses.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:25:34 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
yong.fan@...mcloud.com, sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...mcloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int
may_flags' in nfsd_open()
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 10:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Stupid question: is there any fundamental feature of ext4 this depends
> > on, or would this fix work equally well for fs/ext3?
>
> First of all, Bruce and Ted, thanks a lot for your patience with those
> patches!
>
> I have not looked into it in detail yet, but it should be possible to
> back port it to ext3. I don't think there is anything that would depend
> on ext4. I also have ext3 on my todo list, but I first wanted to have it
> in ext4 (in the sense of stability of ext3, if there still should be a
> bug...) and I think for 3.4 it is too late now anyways. So unless there
> are objections, lets target the back port to ext3 for 3.5?
That sounds sensible, thanks!
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists