lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120412212534.GF6667@fieldses.org> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:25:34 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm> Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, yong.fan@...mcloud.com, sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...mcloud.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd_open() On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 04/12/2012 10:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Stupid question: is there any fundamental feature of ext4 this depends > > on, or would this fix work equally well for fs/ext3? > > First of all, Bruce and Ted, thanks a lot for your patience with those > patches! > > I have not looked into it in detail yet, but it should be possible to > back port it to ext3. I don't think there is anything that would depend > on ext4. I also have ext3 on my todo list, but I first wanted to have it > in ext4 (in the sense of stability of ext3, if there still should be a > bug...) and I think for 3.4 it is too late now anyways. So unless there > are objections, lets target the back port to ext3 for 3.5? That sounds sensible, thanks! --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists