[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:08:20 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Vivek Haldar <haldar@...gle.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Avoid hot statistics cache line in ext4 extent cache
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do you have numbers?
>
> In a benchmark that does mmaped-read, there is a 28% speed up
> after getting rid of the counters.
Ok, that's big. But is it any actual real workload on a real
filesystem? It looks like this should only happen for actual IO, so I
get the feeling that this is some made-up benchmark for a filesystem
on a RAM-disk?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists