linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC, PATCH] Avoid hot statistics cache line in ext4 extent cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1334345213.3796.21.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:26:53 -0700
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Vivek Haldar <haldar@...gle.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Avoid hot statistics cache line in ext4 extent
 cache

On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 14:37 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:31:16AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > 
> > Benchmark is working on files on normal hard disk.  
> > However, I have I have a large number
> > of processes (80 processes, one for each cpu), each reading
> > a separate mmaped file.  The files are in the same directory.
> > That makes cache line bouncing on the counters particularly bad
> > due to the large number of processes running.
> 
> OK, so this is with an 80 CPU machine?
> 
> And when you say 20% speed up, do you mean to say we are actually
> being CPU constrained when reading from files on a normal hard disk?
> 

The files are sparse files.  So the amount of IO is limited and we are
not IO constrained.  

Tim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html