[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120419015646.GW15164@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:56:46 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ext4: status extents
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:07:12AM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> This set is based on the earlier delayed extent tree, but has
> been renamed to a "status extent" scheme. The plan is that the
> tree will be expanded to track allocated extents and also
> support extent locks. Thus status extents seemed like a
> more appropriate name.
How about "extent status tree" ?
>
> Allison Henderson (6):
> ext4: add two structures supporting status extent tree
> ext4: add operations on status extent tree
> ext4: initialize status extent tree
> ext4: let ext4 maintian status extent trees
"maintain".
--D
> ext4: reimplement fiemap on status extent tree
> ext4: reimplement ext4_find_delay_alloc_range on status extent tree
>
> fs/ext4/Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 9 +-
> fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h | 3 +-
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 297 ++++-----------------------------
> fs/ext4/indirect.c | 3 +
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 83 ++++------
> fs/ext4/status_extents.c | 417 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/ext4/status_extents.h | 40 +++++
> fs/ext4/super.c | 13 ++-
> 9 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 fs/ext4/status_extents.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ext4/status_extents.h
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists