lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:36:32 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
	kfm-devel@....org, nautilus-list@...me.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available

On 2012-04-19, at 8:06 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available,
> including file creation time, inode version and data version where available through the underlying filesystem.
> 
> The idea was initially proposed as a set of xattrs that could be
> retrieved with getxattr(), but the general preferance proved to be
> for new syscalls with an extended stat structure.

I would comment that it was the opposite.  It was originally a
stat()-like extension that degraded into a messy getxattr() mess.

> (2) Lightweight stat: Ask for just those details of interest, and
>     allow a netfs (such as NFS) to approximate anything not of
>     interest, possibly without going to the server [Trond Myklebust,
>     Ulrich Drepper].

This was my original motivation for this functionality, so you can
put my name here also.

> The fields in struct xstat come in a number of classes:
> 
> (0) st_dev, st_blksize, st_information.
> 
>     These are local data and are always available.

For the extra two bits it would cost us, I don't think st_blksize
and st_information should always be returned.  st_blksize may be
variable for a distributed filesystem, and some of the fields in
st_information (offline) may not be free to access either.

Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists