[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F92FBE3.50709@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:26:43 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 0/3] Introduce new O_HOT and O_COLD flags
On 04/20/2012 07:01 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> The concern I have is that the notion of hot and cold files *isn't*
> propagated to the page cache, it's just shared between the fs and the
> disk.
Bingo -- full-file hint is too coarse-grained for some workloads. Page
granularity would propagate to the VM as well as block layer, and give
the required flexibility to all workloads. As well as covering the
full-file case.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists