[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120426182401.B246E2C0EA@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
wine-devel@...ehq.org, kfm-devel@....org, nautilus-list@...me.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extended file stat system call
> Interesting. I wasn't intending to provide both statx() and statxat()
> variants, just the latter, in which case I'd've though that -at suffix is
> redundant.
It's certainly fine to provide only *at flavors for any new syscall, IMHO.
The * case is always just a simple degenerate case of *at, and libc can
trivially provide the simpler user API as well using the *at syscall.
But please keep the uniformity that everything taking a descriptor and AT_*
flags is named *at.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists