[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAW_DMg9VLEtV40=qAbT3WZ4tN+ejZxToFHO0AiqDmjvV=V4eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:55:52 +0800
From: Xie Miao <miaoxie1984@...il.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
miaox@...fujitsu.com, Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
Linux Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: introduce try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(_nr)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> > writeback_inodes_sb(_nr) grabs s_umount lock when it want to start
> > writeback,
> > it may bring us deadlock problem when doing umount. So we introduce new
> > functions -- try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(_nr) -- which use
> > down_read_trylock()
> > instead of down_read() to avoid that deadlock problem.
> >
> > This idea came from Christoph Hellwig.
> > Some code is from the patch of Kamal Mostafa.
>
> This just re-implements writeback_inodes_[nr]_sb_if_idle() with a
> trylock instead of a blocking lock.
>
> Just replace the blocking lock in writeback_inodes_[nr]_sb_if_idle()
> with a trylock and use that.
The change of these two functions is relative to three modules, so I think
the patch set now is easy to be reviewed by the developers of each module.
Thanks
Miao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists