lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:37:25 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <>
To:	Ted Tso <>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Maling List <>,
	Linux FS Maling List <>,
	Ext4 Mailing List <>,
	Jan Kara <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty

On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <>
> > 
> > Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked
> > as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories
> > changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment
> > leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these.
> > 
> > Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.
> Hi Ted, what would be the fate of this patch-set?

Hi Ted, I am sorry for being annoying, but what do you think about these

Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists