lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1335775045.2584.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:37:25 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked
> > as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories
> > changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment
> > leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these.
> >
> > Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.
>
> Hi Ted, what would be the fate of this patch-set?
Hi Ted, I am sorry for being annoying, but what do you think about these
patches?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists