[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120515061351.GI16984@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:13:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext4: potential NULL dereference on error
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 13-05-12 17:41:04, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > @@ -508,7 +509,8 @@ fallback_retry:
> > for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
> > grp = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
> > desc = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, grp, NULL);
> > - grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc);
> > + if (desc)
> > + grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc);
> > if (desc && grp_free && grp_free >= avefreei) {
> So you it would be more logical to do:
> if (desc) {
> grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc);
> if (grp_free && grpfree >= avefreei) {
> *group = grp;
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> Wouldn't it?
Yeah. You're obviously right. I'll resend.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists