lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 22:12:57 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, sami.liedes@....fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid hang caused by attempting to rmdir an
 invalid file system

On Wed 30-05-12 13:37:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:08:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 29-05-12 21:50:19, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 28-05-12 17:05:11, Ted Tso wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:29:05PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > > > This patch is good from the POV of covering all filesystems, and
> > > > > avoiding the deadlock at the dcache level.  It would be possible to
> > > > > detect this problem in the filesystem itself during lookup, before
> > > > > the bad link got into the dcache itself.  Something like:
> > > > 
> > > > I like that as a solution for detecting the problem in ext4.  As you
> > > > say, it's still an issue for other file systems, and so the patch I
> > > > proposed is still probably a good idea for the VFS.  But this way ext4
> > > > (and ext3 when Jan backports it) will be able to detect the problem
> > > > and mark the file system as being corrupted.
> > >   Actually, I think there's even better way. d_splice_alias() can rather
> > > easily detect the problem and report it to filesystem. The advantage is
> > > that the check in d_splice_alias() can catch any "hardlinks" to
> > > directories, not just self loops. The patch is attached, I also have
> > > corresponding handling written for ext? filesystems but that's trivial.
> > > I'll post the whole series to Al to have a look.
> >   And now with the attachment. Sorry.
> 
> Well, my understanding of d_splice_alias is that it should just return
> the existing dentry instead of failing.  (It does that now for
> DISCONNECTED dentries, but I don't understand why they're special.)
> So that's what:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git;a=commit;h=9d345b3217b384813680901d42eae3fb380b9f77
> 
> does.
  Thanks for the pointer. In the case I tried to solve, returning the
existing dentry will solve the deadlocks, just user won't be warned that
the filesystem is corrupted. Since you seem to describe a valid case where
we can spot other !DISCONNECTED dentry of a directory, I guess we have no
other choice than using your approach.

We could do some sanity checks in ->lookup method (like Andreas suggested)
but they are not that powerful as a check in d_splice_alias() can be. But
what can one do...

								Honza


> > >From 0715b656ac88ce1bb62800b14d99ef2e25c26d28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:19:01 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: Avoid creation of directory loops for corrupted filesystems
> > 
> > When a directory hierarchy is corrupted (e. g. due to a bit flip on the media),
> > it can happen that it contains loops of directories. That creates possibilities
> > for deadlock when locking directories.
> > 
> > Fix the problem by checking in d_splice_alias() that when we splice a
> > directory, it does not have any other connected alias.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Sami Liedes <sami.liedes@....fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > ---
> >  fs/dcache.c |    4 ++++
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> > index 4435d8b..ca31a1e 100644
> > --- a/fs/dcache.c
> > +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> > @@ -1658,6 +1658,10 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
> >  			d_move(new, dentry);
> >  			iput(inode);
> >  		} else {
> > +			if (unlikely(!list_empty(&inode->i_dentry))) {
> > +				spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > +				return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> > +			}
> >  			/* already taking inode->i_lock, so d_add() by hand */
> >  			__d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> >  			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > -- 
> > 1.7.1
> > 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ