linux-ext4 - Re: container disk quota

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FC7378B.2030707@parallels.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 13:19:07 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	<jeff.liu@...cle.com>
CC:	<jack@...e.cz>, <tytso@....edu>,
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <david@...morbit.com>,
	<hch@...radead.org>, <bpm@....com>, <christopher.jones@...cle.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tm@....ma>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	<chris.mason@...cle.com>, <tinguely@....com>
Subject: Re: container disk quota

On 05/31/2012 12:54 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 06:58 PM, jeff.liu@...cle.com wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> According to glauber's comments regarding container disk quota, it
>> should be binded to mount
>> namespace rather than cgroup.
>>
>> Per my try out, it works just fine by combining with userland quota
>> utilitly in this way.
> that's great.
>
> I'll take a look at the patches.

Despite my criticism, I do believe those are a lot better than the 
previous version. It seems to me to be the right direction, but some 
more transparency is lacking.

I believe you should be able to do it without a lot less changes to the 
tools - if any.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html