[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC83C81.5090001@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:52:33 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: let getattr report the right blocks in delalloc+bigalloc.
On 5/31/12 7:43 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:08:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 1/31/12 9:58 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>>>
>>> In delayed allocation, i_reserved_data_blocks now indicates
>>> clusters, not blocks. So report it in the right number.
>>>
>>> This can be easily exposed by the following command:
>>> echo foo > blah; du -hc blah; sync; du -hc blah
>>>
>>> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
>>> Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen2redhat.com>
>>
>> It'd be great to get this one merged.
>
> I'll merge this, but delalloc and bigalloc is still pretty badly
> busted. But this will make stat return something that is closer to
> being correct...
Hm what else is busted? Is there a testcase written?
How much else do you know of that's busted with bigalloc? :)
(Is this bustedness the reason for not yet having it in the man page?)
-Eric
> - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists