[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCAFDF9.9020609@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:02:33 +0800
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...allels.com>
CC: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"tinguely@....com" <tinguely@....com>,
"containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"bpm@....com" <bpm@....com>,
"christopher.jones@...cle.com" <christopher.jones@...cle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "tm@....ma" <tm@....ma>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"chris.mason@...cle.com" <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: container disk quota
On 06/03/2012 01:47 PM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2012, at 08:23 , Jeff Liu wrote:
>
>> Hi Kirill,
>>
>> On 06/02/2012 11:21 PM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not having looked closely at the original patchset, let me ask - is this
>>>>>>> feature going to be a freebie with Eric's usernamespace patches?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It we can reach a consensus to bind quota on mount namespace for
>>>>>> container or other things maybe.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. OpenVZ doesn't use mount namespaces and still has quotas per container.
>>>>
>>>> AFAICS, OpenVZ has self-released quota tools to supply this feature.
>>>
>>> but standard quota tools work inside container w/o any modifications.
>>> This is very important for us, cause we run unmodified distros inside.
>>
>> Yes, am agree.
>> I can work out a new patches regarding quota tools based on mount namespace w/o any modification.
>
> Jeff, why do you need fs namespace for quotas? OpenVZ works w/o it.
This idea is come from by Glauber's comments for my previous patches
which bind quota to cgroup, and per my try out, it really works to some
extents.
> It sounds as too strict use case limitation. Or do I understand your patchset description wrong?
According to my understood, bind quota to mount namespace is another
quota strategy, and container is a potential user case, maybe could be
used for other things.
I certainly will study openVZ's quota code.
Thanks,
-Jeff
>
> Thanks,
> Kirill
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists