[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611050729.GA12379@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:07:29 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsck/tests: Add the regression test case for
e2fsck.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:16:07PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>
> In commit "e2fsck: Let end_blk to be the maximum value of u32."
> we fix a bug where a normal fallocate will cause e2fsck complain.
> So add it to the regression test suite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
I've changed the description of this commit to reflect the change in
how I propose to fix the problem....
- Ted
commit 8d12c46a22965179cae1e3b47778fdee5efeb513
Author: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
Date: Sun Jun 10 23:56:30 2012 -0400
tests: add new test f_zero_extent_length
If all of the extents in the last extent tree block (ETB) in a
non-trivial extent tree contain uninitialized extents which are after
the end of the file as defined by i_size, the hueristics will
incorrectly estimate the last entry (and hence the node's e_len field)
in the last entry of each level of the extent tree.
As Tao Ma has noted, since e2fsck was requiring that the length
(e_len) field of interior nodes be non-zero, this was causing false
failures where e2fsck would declare that the extent tree was
corrupted.
This was fixed in commit 9c40d14841: "e2fsck: only check for
zero-length leaf extents". Add a regression test case to ensure that
this issue remains fixed.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists