lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:44:10 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: add two more tests of orphaned inode handling

On 2012-06-11, at 11:45 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Add two tests, f_orphan_indirect_inode, and f_orphan_extents_inode,
> which tests the bug fixes in the two previous commits:
> 
> e2fsck: update global free blocks/inodes count when truncating orphan inodes
> libext2fs: fix block iterator for extents when truncating inodes
> 
> diff --git a/tests/f_orphan_indirect_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_orphan_indirect_inode/expect.1
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..33cdd65
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/f_orphan_indirect_inode/expect.1
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +test_filesys: clean, 12/16 files, 21/100 blocks
> +Exit status is 0

Hmm, this doesn't appear to be truncating an orphan inode, unlike
the f_orphan_extent_inode test is doing?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger                       Whamcloud, Inc.
Principal Lustre Engineer            http://www.whamcloud.com/




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ