[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120619133441.GA7001@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:34:42 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Spelic <spelic@...ftmail.org>
Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 and xfs problems in dm-thin on allocation and discard
On Tue, Jun 19 2012 at 7:29am -0400,
Spelic <spelic@...ftmail.org> wrote:
> On 06/19/12 08:32, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> >
> >So do I understand correctly that even though the discard came
> >through and thinp took advantage of it it still returns EOPNOTSUPP ?
> >This seems rather suboptimal. IIRC there was a discussion to add an
> >option to enable/disable sending discard in thinp target down
> >to the device.
>
> I'll ask this too...
> do I understand correctly that dm-thin returns EOPNOTSUPP to the
> filesystem layer even though it is using the discard to unmap
> blocks, and at that point XFS stops sending discards down there
> (while ext4 keeps sending them)?
Are you actually seeing that? Or are you just seizing on Lukas'
misunderstanding?
> This looks like a bug of dm-thin to me. Discards are "supported" in
> such a scenario.
>
> Do you have a patch for dm-thin so to prevent it sending EOPTNOTSUPP ?
thinp should _not_ be sending -EOPNOTSUPP unless 'ignore_discard' is
provided as a feature when loading thin-pool's DM table.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists