linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCHv7 0/5] ext4: stop using write_supers and s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342017141.18274.57.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:32:21 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/5] ext4: stop using write_supers and s_dirt

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 16:46 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> This patch-set makes ext4 file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
> call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
> once all users are gone.

Hi Ted, is there any chance for this stuff to hit 3.6?

Basically I have 3 pending file-systems:
1. ext4 (these patches)
2. sysv - trivial, I hope Andrew would pick them.
3. ufs - should be straight-forward to change the same way I changed
hfs. I'll send patches soon. I hope Andrew would pick them as well.

Everything else - either in upstream or in -mm or in sub-system trees.

After this, I can kill sync_supers and have a chance that Linus would
accept the patches at 3.6-rc1, and end up with sync_super-less 3.6.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)