[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120711171710.GA8073@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:17:10 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Implement subtree ID support for ext4
filesystem
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:26:25PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Yes this looks reasonable, the only thing that we should aware of is id
> collision. We have to reserve pool numbers to quota group id's.
> This can be easily solved by changing disk structure of quota-file
> to use u64 on uid.
How many pool id's are you anticipating? Is 32-bits really not
enough? I'll note that uid_t and gid_t is only 32-bits today, and
part of my goal is to try to preserve compatibility with the existing
quota infrastructure.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists