[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50066C93.1070006@rs.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:58:11 +0900
From: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] ext4: i_size, EOFBLOCKS_FS corruption with xfstests 269
Hi,
I got a issue which makes i_size and EOFBLOCKS_FL corrupted
on ext4 with xfstests 269.
In my environment (linux-3.5-rc7), this can be reproduced
once of 10 times trial.
Kernel: 3.5-rc7
Arch: x86_64
Step and log are as bellow, after xfstests 269, e2fsck outputs
i_size and EOFBLOCKS_FL corruption.
Is this an already known issue?
# ./check 269
FSTYP -- ext4
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 mcds1 3.5.0-rc7
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb3
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr /dev/sdb3 /mnt/mp2
269 97s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 269.out.bad)
--- 269.out 2012-07-02 10:51:34.000000000 +0900
+++ 269.out.bad 2012-07-18 14:09:03.000000000 +0900
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
Run fsstress
Run dd writers in parallel
+_check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/sdb3 is inconsistent (see 269.full)
Ran: 269
Failures: 269
Failed 1 of 1 tests
# cat 269.full
(snip)
e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 2336, i_size is 625045, should be 1277952. Fix? no
Inode 3193 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 1928717, lblk 218)
Clear? no
Inode 4198 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 380389, lblk 73)
Clear? no
Regards,
Akira Fujita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists