[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5018E670.4060608@shiftmail.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:18:56 +0200
From: Spelic <spelic@...ftmail.org>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: du -s src is a lot slower on SSD than spinning disk in the same
laptop
On 08/01/12 07:30, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> 2) Then I put a crucial 256 C300 SSD (the replacement for the one I
> had that just died and killed all my data), and du took 0.3 seconds on
> both my old and new thinkpads.
What does FIO say on your Samsung 830 SSD, 4k random reads?
Last time I checked online benchmarks Samsung 830 had very good 4k
random reads, but it's difficult to find online benchmarks for
incompressible data (which fio rightly uses btw)
multithreded test:
vi fiotest_mt.fio
[random-read]
rw=randread
numjobs=20
thread
iodepth=10
group_reporting
blocksize=4k
size=512m
directory=/mnt/<yourmountpoint>
end_fsync=1
runtime=10
and single threaded (more important here):
vi fiotest_st.fio
[random-read]
rw=randread
numjobs=1
thread
iodepth=1
group_reporting
blocksize=4k
size=4g
directory=/mnt/<yourmountpoint>
end_fsync=1
runtime=10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists