[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120802130642.46b12c59@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:06:42 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> (maintainer:EXT2 FILE SYSTEM),
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION),
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> (maintainer:EXT3 FILE
SYSTEM),
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca> (maintainer:EXT3 FILE
SYSTEM),
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> (maintainer:EXT4 FILE SYSTEM),
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org (open list:EXT2 FILE SYSTEM),
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] implement uid and gid mount options for ext2
> +uid=n[:m] Make all files appear to belong to uid n.
> + Useful for e.g. removable media with fstab
> + options 'user,uid=useruid'. The optional second
> + uid m is actually written to the file system.
So what happens if I insert a USB key containing a device node to the
hard disk ? Why is this functionality useful in the current form ?
(ie I think you need an actual rational security model first)
Also why is this at the per fs level duplicating stuff each time rather
than at the vfs level - this seems to be vfs level functionality.
> +
> +gid=n[:m] Make all files appear to belong to gid n.
> + The optional second gid m is actually written to
> + the file system.
Your documentation seems only half completed ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists