[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5020435F.5000304@bobich.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:21:19 +0100
From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@...ich.net>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 45621] Kernel ooops: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
request at 000000080000001c
On 08/06/2012 11:14 PM, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from markus.doits@...glemail.com 2012-08-06 22:14:42 ---
> Just ran memtest for 3+ hours, 3 passes finished successfully. I know, longer
> is better, but cannot run it longer atm (since it's a server with crucial
> infrastructure). System is not overclocked or so, everything default.
memtest86 is completely useless at finding marginal memory. It'll only
typically find a problem if there is a properly, permanently dead or
stuck bit in the RAM.
If Windows is an option temporarily for testing use OCCT. If it isn't,
I've found something like this to work pretty well for finding CPU and
memory stability issues:
#####
# Assuming your /dev/shm is mounted on tmpfs - make sure it's big
# enough. Adjust count= accordingly
dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1M count=1024 of=/dev/shm/test
# Run one instance of this per CPU thread
#!/bin/bash
sum=`sha512sum /tmp/test`
while (/bin/true); do
echo -n .
sum2=`sha512sum /tmp/test`
if [ "$sum" != "$sum2" ]; then
echo “”
echo “Error detected. $sum != $sum2″
exit
fi
done
#####
That should be a lot better at finding CPU/cache/MCH/RAM issues.
Gordan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists