[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502E9F07.4020005@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:07 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
CC: "'Theodore Ts'o'" <tytso@....edu>,
"'Calvin Walton'" <calvin.walton@...stin.ca>, ap@...arrain.com,
"'Andreas Dilger'" <adilger@...ger.ca>,
"'Javier Marcet'" <jmarcet@...il.com>,
"'Linux Ext4 Mailing List'" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Far too long mount time
On 8/17/12 2:18 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theodore Ts'o [mailto:tytso@....edu]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: Justin Piszcz
> Cc: 'Calvin Walton'; ap@...arrain.com; 'Andreas Dilger'; 'Javier Marcet';
> 'Linux Ext4 Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: Far too long mount time
>
> OK, I think what you were trying to say; that you've only gone back to
> the original kernel and you have not tried the fixed patch. Yes?
>
> Sorry, all of the excess quoting made it very hard for me to parse
> your reply....
>
> - Ted
>
>
> Hi Theo,
>
> I used the patch from this URL:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg33498.html
>
> The filesystem does mount quickly and normally BUT it shows up as 45TB and
> not the 60TB it is normally.
> I went back to the 3.5.1 kernel with 8aeb00ff85a reverted and all is back to
> normal.
Didn't this all start w/ df reporting issues? Seems like we need an xfs
test explicitly for extN, with and without minixdf ....
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists