| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:35:53 -0600 From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> To: "norritt@...nline.de" <norritt@...nline.de> Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Ongoing data reorganization/defragmentation? On 2012-09-12, at 10:36, norritt@...nline.de wrote: > Ongoing data reorganization/defragmentation? > > I also know from the ext4 dcumentation, that ext4 is written to support online defragmentation. I've read several rumours on forums and blogs that indicate ext4 is doing some kind of "ongoing data reorganisations or defragmentation" in the background, in case the mechanisms to prevent fragmentation in the first place failed for some reason (i.e. when a fs is running out of free space). I did not find any credible information to back up these claims, that ext4 is actively reorganizing data, but I didn't find any information that prove these claims wrong either. > > So my question is, does ext4 reorganize data when it encounters fragmented files? If so, is there a way to disable that feature which would not do any good on SSDs? Is there anything else to consider when using ext4 on SSDs, except the things I mentioned above? No, there is no such background reorganization happening of allocated files. With "delalloc" there is batching of block allocations to try and optimize the initial block selection, but it is static after this time. Cheers, Andreas-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists