lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:54:27 +0200
From:	"norritt" <>
Subject: Re: Ongoing data reorganization/defragmentation?

On 12.09.2012 20:15, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, wrote:
>  From what I've found out it's a good idea to:
> - mount with noatime, discard (if drive supports trim)
> The -o discard option might be tricky since some devices still
> handles it quite badly and you can experience big performance drops
> ( although it is somewhat
> outdated already). But you might to try to see yourself if it does
> not hurt your performance.
> The other option would be to use batched discard with fstrim (see
> fstrim from util-linux) and run it once per (day, week, month).
> Thanks!
> -Lukas

Hi  Lukáš,
thank you for pointing out the performance issue with the discard mount 
option, I hadn't read about that yet. As far is I know I'm using a quite 
special SSD (SanDisk, with a SanDisk controller), where most other SSDs 
on the market seem to be based on Marvell, Sandforce or Indilinx 
controllers. I saw that you were using SSDs from various vendors for 
your benchmarking tests. Was a model with SanDisk controller among the 
drives you tested? Would postmark data about disks with SanDisk 
controller be of interest to you?

Regards Nor
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists