| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120928142559.GB9473@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:25:59 +0800 From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: add block-based file punching hole support On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:25:39PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > I run xfstests to do some tests, and I got an error from xfstests # > > 255. The failure reason is that block-based file in ext4 cannot > > support fallocate(2) to allocate an unwritten blocks. I am not sure > > whether we should change # 255 in xfstests or not. So Cc' to Dave > > Chinner to get some feedbacks. > > Zheng, > > I gave these patches a quick try and I'm seeing many more failures > than just test #255. Tests 75, 91, 112, 215, and 263 are also > failing, and I don't think it's all due to punch being supported w/o > fallocate support. Hi Ted, Thanks for sharing this information with me. I will look at these patches after patch series of extent status tree gets stable and submit to the mailing list. Regards, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists