linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: add a variable to record the value of map->m

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121016105631.GA22759@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:56:31 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: add a variable to record the value of
 map->m_flags in tracepoint

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Zheng Liu wrote:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:24:54 +0800
> > From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
> > To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: add a variable to record the value of map->m_flags
> >     in tracepoint
> > 
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> > 
> > When we use trace_ext4_ext/ind_map_blocks_exit, we will print the value of
> > map->m_flags in order that we can understand what currently status is.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/ext4/extents.c           |  2 +-
> >  fs/ext4/indirect.c          |  4 ++--
> >  include/trace/events/ext4.h | 18 ++++++++++--------
> >  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > index 4ecc210..204bafa 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > @@ -4250,7 +4250,7 @@ out2:
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	trace_ext4_ext_map_blocks_exit(inode, map->m_lblk,
> > -		newblock, map->m_len, err ? err : allocated);
> > +		newblock, map->m_len, map->m_flags, err ? err : allocated);
> >  
> >  	return err ? err : allocated;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> > index 792e388..a22d296 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> > @@ -755,8 +755,8 @@ cleanup:
> >  		partial--;
> >  	}
> >  out:
> > -	trace_ext4_ind_map_blocks_exit(inode, map->m_lblk,
> > -				map->m_pblk, map->m_len, err);
> > +	trace_ext4_ind_map_blocks_exit(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_pblk,
> > +					map->m_len, map->m_flags, err);
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > index 66d78dc..680c249b 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > @@ -1520,9 +1520,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__map_blocks_enter, ext4_ind_map_blocks_enter,
> >  
> >  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__map_blocks_exit,
> >  	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > -		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned int len, int ret),
> > +		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned int len, int flags, int ret),
> 
> What about the whole struct ext4_map_blocks instead of m_lblk, m_len
> and m_flags separately ?

Agree.  I will fix it.

> 
> >  
> > -	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, ret),
> > +	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, flags, ret),
> >  
> >  	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >  		__field(	dev_t,		dev		)
> > @@ -1530,6 +1530,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__map_blocks_exit,
> >  		__field(	ext4_fsblk_t,	pblk		)
> >  		__field(	ext4_lblk_t,	lblk		)
> >  		__field(	unsigned int,	len		)
> > +		__field(	int,		flags		)
> 
> map->m_flags is unsigned int.

Oops, I will fix it in second version.
> 
> >  		__field(	int,		ret		)
> >  	),
> >  
> > @@ -1539,28 +1540,29 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__map_blocks_exit,
> >  		__entry->pblk	= pblk;
> >  		__entry->lblk	= lblk;
> >  		__entry->len	= len;
> > +		__entry->flags	= flags;
> >  		__entry->ret	= ret;
> >  	),
> >  
> > -	TP_printk("dev %d,%d ino %lu lblk %u pblk %llu len %u ret %d",
> > +	TP_printk("dev %d,%d ino %lu lblk %u pblk %llu len %u flags %x ret %d",
> 
> It's better to be consistent. If we agree that using %x for flags is
> better format then be it, but change the first patch as well.

Yes, %x is better.  I will fix it in first patch.

Regards,
Zheng

> 
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
> 
> >  		  MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> >  		  (unsigned long) __entry->ino,
> >  		  __entry->lblk, __entry->pblk,
> > -		  __entry->len, __entry->ret)
> > +		  __entry->len, __entry->flags, __entry->ret)
> >  );
> >  
> >  DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__map_blocks_exit, ext4_ext_map_blocks_exit,
> >  	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > -		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned len, int ret),
> > +		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned len, int flags, int ret),
> >  
> > -	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, ret)
> > +	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, flags, ret)
> >  );
> >  
> >  DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__map_blocks_exit, ext4_ind_map_blocks_exit,
> >  	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > -		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned len, int ret),
> > +		 ext4_fsblk_t pblk, unsigned len, int flags, int ret),
> >  
> > -	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, ret)
> > +	TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, pblk, len, flags, ret)
> >  );
> >  
> >  TRACE_EVENT(ext4_ext_load_extent,
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html