linux-ext4 - Re: xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not partitioned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:54:24 -0500
From:	Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>
To:	Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi.linux@...il.com>
CC:	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyakulkarni15@...il.com>,
	<xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not partitioned

On 09/03/2011 03:33 AM, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> If an entire device used for file system creation, the mkfs.ext2/3/4
> asks for confirmation before proceeding. Since the device is
> configured for testing it is safe to assume positive response
> during mkfs.
>
> The patch also replaces hard coded mkfs path with MKFS_PROG variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyakulkarni15@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi.linux@...il.com>
>
> ---
> 032       |    4 ++--
>   049       |    2 +-
>   073       |    2 +-
>   common.rc |    4 ++--
>   4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Looks good

Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>

Prasad,

This patch has been committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests, 
master branch, commit ID 9ea06dce.

Thanks
--Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html