[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B686A8.2010101@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:48:24 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] ext4: include journal blocks in df overhead calcs
To more accurately calculate overhead for "bsd" style
df reporting, we should count the journal blocks as
overhead as well.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
---
V2: I guess s_overhead _is_ in clusters, so do
that conversion after all. Ted, if I'm wrong, you
can pick the other patch ;)
Editorial/soapbox:
TBH it's hard to keep track of what fields are
now stored as "clusters" not blocks . . .
Esp. when we do things like use local vars named "blk" -
blks = count_overhead(sb, i, buf);
but count_overhead() returns *clusters*, so it's
really quite confusing to keep it all straight.
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 80928f7..b441daa 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3229,6 +3229,10 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
memset(buf, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
cond_resched();
}
+ /* Add the journal blocks as well */
+ if (sbi->s_journal)
+ overhead += EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_journal->j_maxlen);
+
sbi->s_overhead = overhead;
smp_wmb();
free_page((unsigned long) buf);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists